The concept of Aid for Trade (AfT) puts together two key concepts: foreign development assistance, which targets the public sector, and trade, which is largely a private sector activity. On paper, there is no tension between public and private trade interests. But in practice, private sector involvement in the design or implementation of AfT activities remains limited.
At the 5th Regional Technical Group (RTG) meeting on AfT in Asia and the Pacific in Seoul (May 2012), both RTG members and its Co-chairs from Japan and Cambodia agreed that encouraging more interaction with the private sector is the most critical emerging issue of AfT in Asia and the Pacific.
Greater private sector involvement in AfT can come in various forms. Some approaches include the following:
However, attracting support for greater private sector involvement in AfT is a daunting task. It should be made clear to the private sector how their support for AfT will figure in their business’ bottom line. There needs to be a compelling motivation for them to act.
For its upcoming second report, the RTG members have agreed to make private sector involvement in AfT the report’s centerpiece supporting other initiatives like greater South-South cooperation, interregional trade, regional integration, and support for vulnerable economies. Following the comprehensive stock-taking of information on AfT flows and initiatives in the first RTG report, it will be interesting to find out what specific policy lessons the second report will highlight. The report is due to be distributed before the 4th Global Review of AfT on July 2013 in Geneva.
Aid for trade refers to forms of assistance for developing countries specifically targeted at helping develop their capacity to trade. Following the recommendations from the 1st Global Review of Aid for Trade by the World Trade Organization, the RTG was formed to provide an informal regional forum for discussing AfT issues and proposals, sharing good practices, collecting and conducting analytical work on AfT, and building partnerships among actors and stakeholders specific to the Asia and the Pacific region.
For more information see:
On May 17, the government of the Republic of Korea decided not to pursue renegotiation of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Clause (ISDS) that is included in the Republic of Korea-US Free Trade Agreement. By contrast, the Australian government has opposed the inclusion of an ISDS clause in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) currently under negotiation. Read full story.
| Trade Spotlight Archives |
The authors find that the introduction of food standards (both voluntary and mandatory) by the exporting country increases export flows. They examine the case of the People’s Republic of China, and find that the effect is largest when the introduced standards are consistent with international norms. The empirical evidence shows that the introduction of one additional internationally harmonized standard increases exports by up to 0.64 percent. This example shows that food standards signal the customer that products meet certain quality measures and that the benefits from increased exports outweigh compliance costs. Read more.
| Working Paper Lists |
© Copyright 2012 Asian International Economists Network.
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without
permission is prohibited. AIEN is not responsible for the
content of external sites.